Challenging Gartner's View: The Unseen Elements of Application Security Posture Management That Start Left® Security Has Already Solved

September 2, 2024

Start Left® Security's response to Gartner's Hype Cycle for Application Security, 2024...


Challenging Gartner's View: The Unseen Elements of Application Security That Start Left® Security Has Already Solved


Gartner's Hype Cycle for Application Security, 2024, offers valuable insights into the evolving landscape of cybersecurity, highlighting trends and technologies that are reshaping how organizations approach security in the software development lifecycle. However, as comprehensive as Gartner’s analysis is, there are critical areas that they overlook—areas that Start Left® Security has already thought through and implemented as part of our solution.


1. Beyond Tools: The Importance of Culture and Program Design

Gartner’s focus on tools and technologies is vital, but it often neglects the cultural and organizational design aspects of security. At Start Left®, we recognize that the success of any security initiative hinges not just on the tools but on the culture and the program that supports them. We’ve embedded best practices and product team-focused design that help organizations overcome the principles of Conway’s Law into our platform, ensuring that the systems we create are reflective of a strong, security-first culture. By fostering a security mindset across all teams, from developers to executives, we drive true DevSecOps, turning security from a checkbox into a core organizational value.


2. The Flawed Legacy of CSPM and ASPM Solutions

Gartner’s analysis suggests that CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management) and ASPM (Application Security Posture Management) are critical for modern security strategies. However, what Gartner doesn’t fully address is the inherent limitations of these approaches. Traditional CSPM and ASPM platforms are often vulnerability-centric, focusing narrowly on identifying and mitigating risks without addressing the root causes—organizational silos and misaligned priorities. Start Left® goes beyond these limitations by offering a program-centric, people-focused platform that integrates security into every aspect of the development lifecycle. We don’t just manage vulnerabilities; we empower teams to prevent them from the start.


3. True Integration vs. The Illusion of Integration

While Gartner discusses the importance of integration across the security stack, it overlooks the fact that many so-called “integrated” platforms still operate in silos. Solutions like CSPMs may aggregate data across the production lifecycle but fail to provide the contextual insights that connect security efforts to business outcomes. Start Left® Security’s platform offers true integration, where every aspect of the security program—from people tracking and code scanning to risk management—is tied back to the product and its impact on the business. This approach ensures that security efforts are not just coordinated but are aligned with the organization’s strategic goals.


4. Developer-Centric Security Without the Noise

Gartner rightly emphasizes the need for developer-centric security solutions but falls short in addressing the noise that often accompanies these tools. The typical IDE (Integrated Development Environment) integrations flood developers with unvetted security alerts, leading to frustration and inefficiency. Start Left®’s approach reduces this noise by incorporating validation and triage steps before security information reaches the developer’s environment. This ensures that only actionable, relevant insights are delivered, allowing developers to maintain velocity without sacrificing security.


5. The Power of Gamification and Continuous Improvement

One area where Gartner could expand its analysis is the role of gamification in driving security success. At Start Left®, we’ve harnessed the power of gamification to create a security experience that is not only effective but also engaging. By rewarding developers for secure coding practices and providing continuous feedback, we foster a culture of continuous improvement. This approach not only enhances security but also boosts morale and retention, turning security into a shared responsibility rather than a burdensome task.


Conclusion: Start Left® Is Ahead of the Curve

While Gartner provides a valuable overview of the current state of application security, there are key elements that are overlooked—elements that are crucial for a holistic, future-proof security strategy. Start Left® Security has anticipated these gaps and built a platform that not only addresses today’s challenges but also prepares organizations for the future. Our focus on culture, true integration, noise reduction, and gamification ensures that security is not just a function of the tools you use, but a core part of how your organization operates.


As the industry continues to evolve, Start Left® is not just keeping pace—we’re leading the way. It’s time to move beyond the limitations of traditional approaches and embrace a solution that’s built for where the industry is going, not where it’s been.


Content Reference: As we explore the gaps in Gartner's perspective on application security, it's important to understand the proactive strategies that Start Left® Security has implemented to fill these voids. For more context on how our platform is leading the way in modern DevSecOps, you can revisit our foundational approach detailed in Gartner Hype Cycle & Start Left® Security: Where Modern Application Security Meets Proactive DevSecOps.

SHARE!

More Resources

March 26, 2025
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and Developer Security Posture Management (DevSPM) tools promise visibility, prioritization, and increased security coverage—compelling offerings for any security-conscious organization. However, there's a critical gap that technical evaluations led solely by AppSec engineers often overlook.
March 22, 2025
From Reactive to Engineering Excellence In our original " Toyota Moment " post, we exposed the fundamental flaw in how cybersecurity has evolved: we’ve treated it like post-production inspection, not like quality engineering. This follow-up digs deeper into how we got here, why the industry's stuck in a loop, and what the shift to Execution Intelligence really means. The security industry, much like early manufacturing, was built on reactivity—not design. But just as Toyota revolutionized manufacturing with Lean systems and embedded quality, software security is ready for its own transformation. 🔁 Here’s how it’s played out over the last 25 years: REACTIVE (2000-2015) — Piling on tools, alerts, and policies ⬇ WARRANTY (2015-2025) — CSPM + GRC retrofits risk after code ships; shift-left emerges ⬇ PROACTIVE (2022-2026) — ASPM solves what CSPM misses (but only tracks and doesn't fix the overarching problems with the security "system") ⬇ EXCELLENCE (2025-FUTURE) — Start Left as a methodology connects risk to developer behavior and builds security into execution itself
March 19, 2025
Traditional Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) vendors are getting it wrong because they’re focused on the wrong unit of measure.
March 13, 2025
The Industry is Stuck in a Broken Model For decades, cybersecurity has been a bolt-on process—chasing vulnerabilities, enforcing controls, and tracking risks instead of fixing the way software is built. The result? More tools, more alerts, more friction—but no real improvement in execution. Engineering continues to move forward, shipping faster than ever, but security remains reactive, layered on at the end of the development lifecycle, slowing teams down.
January 17, 2025
Security teams often rely on CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management) and Runtime Protection to safeguard cloud environments and applications after deployment. However, these solutions fail to address the root cause of vulnerabilities—unsecure development practices.
January 10, 2025
The Shift from Developer-Led to Developer-Championed Security
January 3, 2025
The cybersecurity industry loves yet another good buzzword. Right now, CNAPP (Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform) is the term being marketed as the ultimate convergence of ASPM (Application Security Posture Management) and CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management). But here’s the reality: CNAPP isn’t truly a best-of-breed convergence—it’s an acquisition-fueled patchwork of separate tools stitched together.
December 13, 2024
Discover the hidden costs of ignoring Security by Design. Learn why embedding security into your software development process is essential to avoid compliance risks, customer trust issues, and operational inefficiencies. Explore best practices to safeguard your growth and future-proof your business.
November 21, 2024
While CSPM & ASPM platforms stitched together in an acquisition claim to offer an integrated approach to security by aggregating data across the full lifecycle of software development, they often fall short of delivering true integration. Instead of fostering a cohesive, product-centric DevOps model, these platforms inadvertently create silos within their own systems. The root of the problem lies in the way these platforms are designed—they focus on providing lifecycle scan aggregation without addressing the need for a people-focused, product-centric implementation that truly facilitates DevSecOps.
Show more
Share by: